<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>Iranian Rehabilitation Journal</title>
<title_fa>مجله انگلیسی زبان توانبخشی</title_fa>
<short_title>Iranian Rehabilitation Journal</short_title>
<subject>Medical Sciences</subject>
<web_url>http://irj.uswr.ac.ir</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>18</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>agent2</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>17353602</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>17353610</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii></journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>10.29252/nrip.irj</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid></journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai></journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science></journal_id_science>
<language>en</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1405</year>
	<month>3</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2026</year>
	<month>6</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>24</volume>
<number>2</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>en</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa></title_fa>
	<title>Mesotherapy vs Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve  Stimulation for Chronic Low Back Pain in Patients With Radiculopathy</title>
	<subject_fa>طب فیزیکی و توانبخشی</subject_fa>
	<subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject>
	<content_type_fa>پژوهشي</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Original Research Articles</content_type>
	<abstract_fa></abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;strong&gt;Objectives&lt;/strong&gt;: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) with radiculopathy is a disabling condition, and conventional treatments often provide limited relief. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and mesotherapy are promising modalities; however, their comparative efficacy is not well established. This study aimed to compare the effects of mesotherapy versus TENS on pain and functional disability in patients with magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed lumbar radiculopathy.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Methods&lt;/strong&gt;: This open-label randomized clinical trial included 60 patients with CLBP. Patients were allocated to either a TENS group (10 sessions of 100 Hz stimulation) or a mesotherapy group (six sessions of subcutaneous piroxicam and lidocaine injections). Pain intensity was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) and functional disability with the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire (RMDQ) at baseline, immediately post-treatment, and at one- and two-month follow-ups.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Results&lt;/strong&gt;: Both TENS (P&lt;0.001) and mesotherapy (P&lt;0.001) groups showed significant improvements in VAS and RMDQ scores compared to their respective baselines. Immediately following the interventions, patients in the mesotherapy group demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in both pain VAS and RMDQ scores than those in the TENS group. This superiority was maintained at the one- and two-month follow-up assessments, where the mesotherapy group continued to show significantly better outcomes. The therapeutic effect of TENS was transient, with scores at one and two months not being significantly different from baseline.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Discussion&lt;/strong&gt;: Mesotherapy provides a more potent and durable reduction in pain and disability compared to TENS for patients with CLBP. The sustained benefit of mesotherapy suggests it is a more robust therapeutic option for this condition, potentially creating a meaningful therapeutic window that allows patients to more effectively engage in active rehabilitation programs.</abstract>
	<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
	<keyword>Herniated disc, Radiculopathy, Chronic low back pain (CLBP), Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), Mesotherapy</keyword>
	<start_page>167</start_page>
	<end_page>176</end_page>
	<web_url>http://irj.uswr.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-2615-1&amp;slc_lang=en&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>Parisa </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Taheri</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>Ramaghroori@yahoo.com</email>
	<code></code>
	<orcid>0000-0002-8335-8862</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan, Iran.</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Fatemeh </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Hoseinzade</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>fatemehoseinzade98@gmail.com</email>
	<code></code>
	<orcid>0009-0009-7742-1376</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan, Iran.</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Razieh </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Maghroori</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>ramaghroori@yahoo.com</email>
	<code></code>
	<orcid>0000-0001-5616-6569</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan, Iran.</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
