988368
یکشنبه 2 دی 1403
دوره 15، شماره 3 - ( September 1396 )
جلد 15 شماره 3 صفحات 206-199 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Khodabakhshi Koolaee A, Mosalanejad L, Mamaghanirad B. The Effectiveness of Group Training of Choice Theory on Quality of Life and Hope in Blind People. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal 2017; 15 (3) :199-206
URL: http://irj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-740-fa.html
URL: http://irj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-740-fa.html
The Effectiveness of Group Training of Choice Theory on Quality of Life and Hope in Blind People. مجله انگلیسی زبان توانبخشی. 1396; 15 (3) :199-206
چکیده: (7599 مشاهده)
Objectives: Choice theory is rooted in psychological concepts like self-concept, successful identity, and quality of the world. This theory could be useful for people seeking for hope and a better life. The purpose of this research was to investigate the effectiveness of group training of choice theory on life quality and hope in blind people.
Methods: The statistical population of this research includes all the blind members of the Asaye Sefid Charity of Tehran in 2015. The research sample included 30 blind people from the Asaye Sefid Charity, selected via simple random sampling. The data in this study have been collected using the Life Quality questionnaire of the World Health Organization (the brief 26-question form) and the Snyder Hope questionnaire. Data analysis was performed by covariance analysis.
Results: The results indicate that the training of choice theory concepts affected the quality of life (F=22.5, P<0.001) and on hope (F=35.17, P<0.001). Therefore, it seems that the training of choice theory concepts could improve the quality of life and hope for blind people.
Discussion: The choice theory concepts have positive effects on people with visual impairments. In addition, the findings of this research suggest that mental health professionals can use this psychological intervention for improving the life satisfaction and hope in those blind people.
فهرست منابع
1. Semnanian S, khodabakhshi koolaee A. [The comparison of the spiritual intelligence and self-concept of blinds and sighted high school girl students in Tehran (Persian)]. Journal of Research on Religion & Health. 2017; 3(1):42-52.
2. Kalani N, Mosalanejad L, Zabetian H, Abdolahifard S. The effect of group hope therapy integrated with mobile learning on hope and perceived stress levels in MS patients. Biosciences, Biotechnology Research Asia. 2015; 12(3):1947-55. doi: 10.13005/bbra/1861 [DOI:10.13005/bbra/1861]
3. Bhagotra S, Sharma A, Raina B. Psycho-social adjustments and rehabilitations of the blind. Social Medicine. 2008; 10(1):48-52.
4. Haj Yosefi A. Quality of life and reformation strategies. Social Work Journal. 2000; 8(2):30-8.
5. Kennedy P, Marsh N, Lowe R, Grey N, Short E, Rogers B. A longitudinal analysis of psychological impact and coping strategies following spinal cord injury. British Journal of Health Psychology. 2000; 5(2):157-72. doi: 10.1348/135910700168838 [DOI:10.1348/135910700168838]
6. Khodabakhshi koolaee A, Esmaeilifar A, Falsafinejad MR. [Comparison of life meaning and hopefulness between spinal cord injuries, blinds, and healthy people in Kerman-Iran (Persian)]. Iranian Journal of Rehabilitation Nursing. 2015; 1(3):54-64.
7. Feldman DB, Snyder CR. Hope and the meaningful life: Theoretical and empirical associations between goal-directed thinking and life meaning. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 2005; 24(3):401-21. doi: 10.1521/jscp.24.3.401.65616 [DOI:10.1521/jscp.24.3.401.65616]
8. Glasser W. Station of the mind: New direction for reality therapy. New York: HarperCollins; 1981. [PMCID]
9. Caterin LC. The effect of reality therapy based group counseling on the self-esteem. Charlottesville: University of Virginia; 2008.
10. Khodabakhshi Koolaee A. [The application of counseling and psychotherapy theories in the rehabilitation of the disabled (Persian)]. Tehran: Danzhe; 2016.
11. Finger RP, Kupitz D, Holz F, Ramani R. The impact of the severity of the vision loss on vision-related quality of life in India: An evaluation of the IND-VFQ-33. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. 2011; 52(9):6081-8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-7388 [DOI:10.1167/iovs.11-7388]
12. Nejat S, Holakouie Naieni K, Mohammad K, Majdzadeh SR. [The World Health Organization quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire: Translation and validation study of the Iranian version (Persian)]. Journal of School of Public Health and Institute of Public Health Research. 2006; 4(4):1-12.
13. Khodabakhshi-Koolaee A, Mosalanejad L, Gholami M, Massah O. Effectiveness of group hope therapy on the psychological indicators in women with addicted husbands. Iranian Journal of Rehabilitation. 2017; 15(1):15-22. [DOI:10.18869/nrip.irj.15.1.15]
14. Nakhaei F. [Effects of cognitive- Behavioral group therapy and reality therapy on hope, happiness, and sense of guilt on female talaba (Persian)] [MSc. thesis]. Mashhad: Ferdowsi University; 2014.
15. Alma MA, Groothoff JW, Melis-Dankers BJM, Post MWM, Suurmeijer TPBM, Van der Mei SF. Effects of a multidisciplinary group rehabilitation programme on participation of the visually impaired elderly: A pilot study. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2012; 34(20):1677-85. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.656795 [DOI:10.3109/09638288.2012.656795]
16. Ebadi P. [The effectiveness of reality therapy on the hope of breast cancer patients (Persian)]. Breast Cancer. 2013; 2(6):26-34.
17. Najafi S, Nadri F, Sahebi A. [The effectiveness of choice theory in quality of life and resilience of drug users (Persian)]. Research on Addiction. 2015; 9(33):135-44.
18. Valinezhad Z. [The effectiveness of reality therapy on quality of life in divorced women 18 to 23 years old] [MSc. thesis]. Tehran: Payam Noor University; 2014.
19. Eslami R, Hashemian P, Jarahi L, Modarres Gharavi M. [Effectiveness of group reality therapy on happiness and quality of life in unsupervised adolescents in Mashhad (Persian)]. Journal of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. 2014; 56(5):300-6.
20. Bonomi A, Patrik D, Bushnell D. Validation of the United States' version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) instrument. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2000; 53(1):1-12. [DOI:10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00123-7]
21. Glasser W. Choice theory [A. Sahebi, Persian Trans]. Tehran: Sayeh sokhan; 2010.
22. Rees G, Keeffe JE, Hassell J, Larizza M, Lamoureux E. A self-management program for low vision: Program overview and pilot evaluation. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2010; 32(10):808-15. doi: 10.3109/09638280903304193 [DOI:10.3109/09638280903304193]
23. McGrath C, Sidhu K, Mahl H. Interventions that facilitate the occupational engagement of older adults with age-related vision loss: findings from a scoping review. Journal of Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics. 2017; 35(1):3-19. doi: 10.1080/02703181.2016.1267292 [DOI:10.1080/02703181.2016.1267292]
24. Nyman SR, Dibb B, Victor CR, Gosney MA. Emotional well-being and adjustment to vision loss in later life: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2012; 34(12):971-81. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.626487 [DOI:10.3109/09638288.2011.626487]
25. Maleki-Tabar A, Khoshkonesh A, Khodabakhshi-Koolaee A. [Comparing the self- concept and social adjustment among blind and healthy male student (Persian)]. Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences. 2012; 13(1):33.
