Volume 15, Issue 3 (September 2017)                   Iranian Rehabilitation Journal 2017, 15(3): 185-192 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Momeni F, Shiyasi Y, Mirzaasgari H. Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Brief Quality of Life Questionnaire in Bipolar Disorder. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal 2017; 15 (3) :185-192
URL: http://irj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-705-en.html
Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Brief Quality of Life Questionnaire in Bipolar Disorder
Fereshte Momeni * 1, Yasaman Shiyasi2 , Hosna Mirzaasgari2
1- Psychosis Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (5902 Views)

Objectives: To date, there is no specific scale to assess the quality of life in Bipolar Disorder (BD). The Quality of Life in Bipolar Disorder (QoL.BD) is the first questionnaire designed for this purpose. In this study, we aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the Persian Brief Quality of Life in Bipolar Disorder (Brief QoL.BD).
Methods: After forward and backward translation of the questionnaire and comparing the two translations, the Persian version of the questionnaire was prepared to be tested. The statistical population comprised all patients and normal individuals in Tehran . The sample population included 118 patients with BD and 132 healthy individuals without the history of mental disorder; they were selected using a convenience sampling method. The study instruments included the Beck Depression Inventory-II, Bech–Rafaelsen Mania Rating Scale, the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), and the Brief QoL.BD. Data were analyzed using SPSS and Lisrel statistical programs.
Results: The confirmatory factor analysis indices indicated a relatively good model fit. Content validity estimates were also acceptable. Convergent validity was examined by calculating the correlation between the scores on the Brief QoL.BD and those on the SF-36 questionnaire; the results were found to be significant (r=0.36, P<0.01). Discriminant validity was assessed by comparing the Brief QoL.BD total scores between the groups of patients with BD and healthy individuals; the results indicated a significant difference between the two groups (t=65.09, P<0.01). The Cronbach’s alpha of 0.70 indicated an internal consistency. A test–retest reliability estimate of 0.89 indicated a high reliability of the scale.
Discussion: The Brief QoL.BD has high validity and reliability in assessing the QoL of patients with BD in Iran.

Keywords: Quality of life, Bipolar disorder, Psychometrics, Iran
Full-Text [PDF 541 kb]   (2329 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (1280 Views)  
Article type: Original Research Articles | Subject: Psychology
Received: 2017/05/28 | Accepted: 2017/07/19 | Published: 2017/10/2
References
1. Gomes BC, Kleinman A, Ferrari Carvalho A, Pereira TCF, Gurgel AP, et al. Quality of life in youth with bipolar disorder and unaffected offspring of parents with bipolar disorder. Journal of Affective Disorder. 2016; 202:53-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.05.041 [DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2016.05.041]
2. Sadock BJ, Sadock VA. Kaplan and Sadock' synopsis of psychiatry: Behavioral Sciences/clinical psychiatry. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
3. Miklowitz DJ, Johnson SL. The psychopathology and treatment of bipolar disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. 2006; 2(1):199-235. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.2.022305.095332 [DOI:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.2.022305.095332]
4. Havermans R, Nicolson NA, Devries MW. Daily hassles, uplifts,and time use in individuals with bipolar disorder remission. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 2007; 195(9):745-51. doi: 10.1097/nmd.0b013e318142cbf0 [DOI:10.1097/NMD.0b013e318142cbf0]
5. Fulford D, Peckham AD, Johnson K, Johnson SL. Emotion perception and quality of life in bipolar I disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2014; 152-154:491–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.08.034 [DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2013.08.034]
6. Morton E, Murray G. What does quality of life refer to in bipolar disorder research? A systematic review of the construct's definition,usage and measurement. Journal of Affective Disorder. 2017; 212:128-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.01.026 [DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2017.01.026]
7. Pennacchini M, Bertolaso M, Elvira MM, De Marinis MG. A Brief history of the quality of Life: Its use in medicine and in philosophy. Clinical Therapeutics. 2011; 162(3):e99-e103. PMID: 21717042
8. Cummins R. The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos. Social Indicators Research. 1996; 38(3):303-28. doi: 10.1007/bf00292050 [DOI:10.1007/BF00292050]
9. World Health Organization. The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment(WHOQL):Position paper from the World Health organization. Social Science & Medicine. 1995; 41(10):1403-9. doi: 1016/0277-9536(95)00112-k
10. Michalak EE, Yatham LN, Lam RW. Quality of life in bipolar disorder:A review of the literature. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2005; 3(1):72. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-3-72 [DOI:10.1186/1477-7525-3-72]
11. Michalak E, .E, Yatham LN, Kolesar S, Lam RW. Bipolar disorder and quality of life: A patient-centered perspective. Quality of life research. 2006; 15(1):25-37. doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-0376-7 [DOI:10.1007/s11136-005-0376-7]
12. Michalak EE, Murray G, Crest BD. Development of the QoL.BD: A disorder-spesific scale to assess quality of life in bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disorders. 2010; 12(7):727-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2010.00865.x [DOI:10.1111/j.1399-5618.2010.00865.x]
13. Xiao L, Gao Y, Zhang L, Chen P, Sun X, Tang S. Validity and reliability of the Brief version of Quality of Life in Bipolar disorder (Bref QoL.BD) among Chinese bipolar patients. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2016; 193:66-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.12.074 [DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2015.12.074]
14. Kline Leidy N. Health-related quality of life assessment in euthymic and depressed patients with bipolar disorder Psychometric performance of four self-report measures. Journal of Affective Disorders. 1998; 48(2-3):207–14. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(97)00147-x [DOI:10.1016/S0165-0327(97)00147-X]
15. Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NM, O'Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Usherwood T, et al. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: New outcome measure for primary care. BMJ. 1992; 305(6846):160-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6846.160 [DOI:10.1136/bmj.305.6846.160]
16. Montazeri A, Goshtasebi A, Vahdanian M, Gandek B. The short form Health survey (SF-36): Translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Quality of Life Research. 2005; 14(3):875-82. doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-1014-5 [DOI:10.1007/s11136-004-1014-5]
17. Habibi M, Khodaei E, Moghadamzadeh A, Shamsedini S, Barekatain M. [Psychometric properties and hierarchical factor structure of short form health survey scale(SF-36) in a non-clinical sample (Persian)]. Journal of research in Behavioral sciences. 2010; 10(6): 472-90.
18. Beck AT, Streer RA. Beck Depression Inventory. New York: The psychological corporation; 1993.
19. Beck AT, Streer RA, Garbin MG. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review. 1998; 8(1):77-100. doi: 10.1016/0272-7358(88)90050-5 [DOI:10.1016/0272-7358(88)90050-5]
20. Fata L, Birashk B, Atefvahid MK, Dabson KS. [Meaning assignment structures/schema, emotional states and cognitive processing of emotional information: comparing two conceptual frameworks (Persian)]. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology. 2005; 11(3):312-26.
21. Stefan-Dabson K, Mohammadkhani P, Massah-Choulabi O. [Psychometrics characteristic of Beck Depression Inventory-II in patients with magor depressive disorder (Persian)]. Archives of Rehabilitation. 2007; 8:80-6.
22. Bech P, Bolwig TG, Kramp P, Rafalsen OJ. The bech-rafaelsen mania scale and the Hamilton depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 1979; 59(4):420-30. PMID: 433633 [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1979.tb04484.x] [PMID]
23. Bentler PM, Bonett DG. Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin. 1980; 88(3):588-606. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.88.3.588 [DOI:10.1037//0033-2909.88.3.588]
Send email to the article author

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb