Showing 4 results for Knee Osteoarthritis
Mokhtar Arazpour, Fatemeh Zare Zadeh, Monireh Ahmadi Bani,
Volume 10, Issue 3 (10-2012)
Abstract
Objectives: Patients suffering from mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis may be treated with unloader knee orthoses or laterally wedged insoles. The aim of this study was to identify and compare the effects of two orthoses in these patients.
Methods: 56 patients with medial compartment knee OA were evaluated when wearing an unloader knee orthosis and insoles with a 6° lateral wedge which were randomly assigned. Testing was performed at baseline and after 6 months of use with the two types of orthoses. The KOOS score was used to assess outcomes in this study. A paired T test was used for comparing base line and the 6th month post interventions KOOS sub scale score. An independent T test was used for analyzing the efficacy between the two orthoses.
Results: Each of the interventions improved all parameters compared to the baseline condition (P=0.000). However, in comparing the effect between these orthoses, we did not find significant differences in activities of daily living (P=0.871), or sports and recreational activities (P=0.351). The pain and symptoms (P=0.000) were, however, significantly different between the two interventions.
Discussion: The unloader knee orthoses were more effective than lateral wedge insoles in reducing pain and symptoms.
Narges Jahantigh Akbari, Ahmad Reza Askary Ashtiani, Salman Nouraisarjou,
Volume 17, Issue 4 (12-2019)
Abstract
Objectives: Knee osteoarthritis is one of the most common musculoskeletal problems that is associated with impaired balance. This study was conducted to determine the result of balance and strengthening training in static stability indices in females with knee osteoarthritis.
Methods: In this single-blind randomized controlled study, 13 patients were determined through the available sampling method and randomly assigned to strengthening exercises and balance exercises groups. Strengthening exercises were based on quadriceps strengthening and in the balance exercises group, it included balance exercises. Anterior-posterior, overall, and medial-lateral stability measures were performed by Biodex before and after the treatment in the static situation at the status of open and close eyes on one and two feet. The treatment was performed 15 sessions for 3 weeks. The data were analyzed by paired t-test and independent t-test.
Results: In strengthening exercises group, at the static status, overall and anterior-posterior stability index on two feet at the status of open eyes reduced from 1.26±0.82 to 0.76±0.48 (P=0.02) and from 0.87±0.53 to 0.56±0.37 (P=0.02), respectively. In the balance exercise group, in the static status, overall lateral stability index on the involved foot at the status of close eyes reduced from 9.15±3.18 to 7.53±2.81 (P=0.00) and from 8.27±3.32 to 6.77±2.95 (P=0.00), respectively. There was no significant difference between the groups (P>0.05).
Discussion: There was no difference between them regarding the impact on static stability indices. However, strengthening exercises caused improvement in the greater number of stability indices compared to those in the balance exercises group.
Wasila Habib, Adedapo Wasiu Awotidebe,
Volume 19, Issue 4 (12-2021)
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to compare, from a patient’s perspective, the cost-effectiveness between a self-managed program and usual physiotherapy care in treating knee osteoarthritis.
Methods: The study participants were assigned into two groups: group I received a weekly physiotherapy treatment plus instructions on self-management skills in goal setting, pain management, exercise, healthy eating, and dealing with fatigue (self-managed group); group II had a physiotherapy session three times a week (usual care group). The osteoarthritis cost and consequence and European quality of life-5 dimension (EQ-5D) were used to generate utility scores. The health effects measure of quality-adjusted life year (QALY) was obtained, and an incremental cost-effective ratio was calculated. Cost-effectiveness was determined by plotting a cost-effectiveness plane of incremental cost against QALY obtained.
Results: After 8 weeks of intervention, the self-managed group recorded more significant improvements in pain level, function, and health-related quality of life than the usual care group. Clinical consultation costs (Mean±SD NGN [Nigerian naira]=1800±979), physiotherapy treatment costs (Mean±SD NGN=4000±00), and transportation costs (Mean±SD NGN=1,940±1,150) were less for the self-managed group than the usual care group. Imaging (x-ray) and drug costs did not differ significantly between groups. The QALYs gained over the 8-week intervention period was 0.13 for the self-management group compared to 0.11 for the usual care group.
Discussion: From the patient’s perspective, a self-managed program was cost-effective and cheaper for healthcare resource use. Physiotherapists may adopt the program to reduce out-of-pocket expenses for patients with knee osteoarthritis.
Farzaneh Hajmohammadi, Mohammad Hosseinifar, Asghar Akbari, Fatemeh Ghiasi, Hassan Namvar, Ahmadreza Askari Ashtiani,
Volume 19, Issue 4 (12-2021)
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the efficacy of balance exercises in the aquatic and Non-aquatic environments compared with control in patients with grade 2 or 3 knee Osteoarthritis (OA).
Methods: For this single-blind, randomized control trial study, 43 women with mild to moderate knee OA were recruited through a simple non-probability sampling method. They were randomly assigned to the aquatic balance exercise group (n=15), Non-aquatic balance exercise group (n=15), and a control group (n=13). The intervention programs comprised aquatic and Non-aquatic balance training. Fall risk, the primary outcome, was measured by the Biodex balance system before and after the intervention. One-way ANOVA and paired sample t-test were used for analyzing data.
Results: After 4 weeks training, the Mean±SD fall risk score significantly decreased from 3.49±1.14 to 2.59±1.22 (P<0.001) in the aquatic balance training group, from 3.21±0.62 to 2.19±0.62 (P<0.001) in the Non-aquatic balance training group, and from 3.77±1.13 to 3.17±1.22 (P<0.001) in the control group. Regarding between-group comparisons, we found significant differences between the Non-aquatic balance training group and the control group (P=0.03).
Discussion: Despite the environment, the balance exercise program significantly improved fall risk scores among patients with grade 2 or 3 knee osteoarthritis.
