988368
جمعه 28 اردیبهشت 1403
دوره 21، شماره 4 - ( 9-1402 )
جلد 21 شماره 4 صفحات 600-591 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Ethics code: IR.USWR.REC.1400.095
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Azarnia S, Ezatti K, Naghdi S, Abdollahi I, Shanbehzadeh S, Baharloueii H et al . The Effect of Concurrent Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Robotic Training of the Upper Limb in Stroke Recovery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal 2023; 21 (4) :591-600
URL: http://irj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-1765-fa.html
URL: http://irj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-1765-fa.html
The Effect of Concurrent Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Robotic Training of the Upper Limb in Stroke Recovery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. مجله انگلیسی زبان توانبخشی. 1402; 21 (4) :591-600
چکیده: (967 مشاهده)
Objectives: Transcranial direct current stimulation and robotic therapy (RT) are two modalities in neurorehabilitation for the improvement of upper limb function in stroke patients. However, the additional effects of the concurrent application of these two techniques compared to RT alone on upper limb function in stroke patients have not been studied yet. We analyzed the effectiveness of concurrent tDCS and RT compared to RT alone on upper limb motor function in stroke patients.
Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL, EMBASE, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database was performed from 2000 to January 1, 2021. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool. All statistical analyses were performed in STATA software, version 14, and the Mean±SD was used as the pooled statistics.
Results: The result showed that concurrent tDCS and RT had moderate but non-significant pooled effect sizes for upper limb Fugl-Meyer assessment (SMD=0.31, 95% CI, -0.20%, 0.83%, I2=84.1%).
Discussion: According to the results of this study, no difference was obtained in the efficacy of concurrent tDCS and RT compared to RT alone on upper limb function in stroke survivors.
Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL, EMBASE, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database was performed from 2000 to January 1, 2021. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool. All statistical analyses were performed in STATA software, version 14, and the Mean±SD was used as the pooled statistics.
Results: The result showed that concurrent tDCS and RT had moderate but non-significant pooled effect sizes for upper limb Fugl-Meyer assessment (SMD=0.31, 95% CI, -0.20%, 0.83%, I2=84.1%).
Discussion: According to the results of this study, no difference was obtained in the efficacy of concurrent tDCS and RT compared to RT alone on upper limb function in stroke survivors.
نوع مقاله: مروري |
موضوع مقاله:
فیزیک درمانی
دریافت: 1401/6/13 | پذیرش: 1401/10/4 | انتشار: 1402/9/10
دریافت: 1401/6/13 | پذیرش: 1401/10/4 | انتشار: 1402/9/10
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
