Ethics code: IR.USWR.REC.1400.095
Azarnia S, Ezatti K, Naghdi S, Abdollahi I, Shanbehzadeh S, Baharloueii H et al . The Effect of Concurrent Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Robotic Training of the Upper Limb in Stroke Recovery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal 2023; 21 (4) :591-600
URL:
http://irj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-1765-en.html
1- Student Research Committee, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
3- Musculoskeletal Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
4- Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
5- Rehabilitation Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
6- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Abstract: (1922 Views)
Objectives: Transcranial direct current stimulation and robotic therapy (RT) are two modalities in neurorehabilitation for the improvement of upper limb function in stroke patients. However, the additional effects of the concurrent application of these two techniques compared to RT alone on upper limb function in stroke patients have not been studied yet. We analyzed the effectiveness of concurrent tDCS and RT compared to RT alone on upper limb motor function in stroke patients.
Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL, EMBASE, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database was performed from 2000 to January 1, 2021. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool. All statistical analyses were performed in STATA software, version 14, and the Mean±SD was used as the pooled statistics.
Results: The result showed that concurrent tDCS and RT had moderate but non-significant pooled effect sizes for upper limb Fugl-Meyer assessment (SMD=0.31, 95% CI, -0.20%, 0.83%, I2=84.1%).
Discussion: According to the results of this study, no difference was obtained in the efficacy of concurrent tDCS and RT compared to RT alone on upper limb function in stroke survivors.
Full-Text [PDF 1047 kb]
(542 Downloads)
| |
Full-Text (HTML) (274 Views)
• Transcranial direct stimulation (tDCS) and robotic therapy (RT) had no additional effects on motor function improvement in stroke patients.
• The metaplasticity, Hebbian plasticity, and ceiling effects must be taken into account when combining tDCS and RT as a neurorehabilitation approach.
• When applying two treatment strategies concurrently, hemostatic metaplasticity can reduce the effect of the latter strategy to maintain the neural network activity within a physiologic range.
Plain Language Summary
Stroke is one of the major health problems in the world and one of the most debilitating neurological diseases in adults. Stroke survivors suffer from persistent motor, cognitive, and somatosensory complications. Long-term physical dysfunction and limitations in activities of daily living direct rehabilitation systems to improve patients’ motor performance. Transcranial direct stimulation (tDCS) and robotic therapy (RT) are two neurorehabilitation methods for improving the function of the upper limbs in stroke patients. Research results have shown that robotic therapy and direct transcranial stimulation each alone have beneficial effects on improving patients’ performance. In recent years, to make rehabilitation treatment more effective, many studies have investigated the effects of the simultaneous use of these two methods. Summarizing the results of the studies showed that the simultaneous use of these two methods does not result in a greater effect.
Article type:
Reviews |
Subject:
Physiotherapy Received: 2022/09/4 | Accepted: 2022/12/25 | Published: 2023/12/1
Send email to the article author