Volume 16, Issue 1 (March 2018)                   IRJ 2018, 16(1): 11-16 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Khandan M, Vosoughi S, Poursadeghiyan M, Azizi F, Ahounbar E, Koohpaei A. Ergonomic Assessment of Posture Risk Factors Among Iranian Workers: An Alternative to Conventional Methods. IRJ. 2018; 16 (1) :11-16
URL: http://irj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-739-en.html
1- Department of Ergonomics, Faculty of Health, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
2- Department of Occupational Health Engineering, Faculty of Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
3- Research Center in Emergency and Disaster Health, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
4- Work Health Research Centre, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
5- Substance Abuse and Dependence Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (291 Views)
Objectives: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders are a global problem which evolves at different workplaces such as industries, administrative, and agriculture sectors. In various studies, such disorders were assessed through multiple methods. It is necessary to evaluate different tools to use them in diverse communities. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the new ergonomic evaluating method of Novel Ergonomic Postural Assessment (NERPA) method in Iran. 
Methods: The employees (n=455) of operational units of four companies (drug producers, printing and publishing houses, dairy, and drinks producers) were assessed in 2014. It was a cross-sectional and descriptive-analytical study. One of the researchers developed a questionnaire that was applied to collect demographic data. The NERPA, Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA), and Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) methods were utilized to analyze posture risk factors. Spearman correlation and Kappa agreement were used to analyze the collected data through SPSS V22. 
Results: Findings indicated that printing company had the best and pharmaceutical industries had the worst state regarding RULA’s results. The risk levels between NERPA and REBA were not statistically significant (P>0.05), however, that was significant with RULA’s outcome. Also, the results of NERPA and other two methods were correlated significantly (P<0.05). Pain in the lumbar area was implied to be the most prevalent problem (35.1%).
Discussion: Data of the present study suggest that NERPA method was a valid tool compared to RULA. The NERPA method could be used to evaluate standing tasks among industrial workers. However, the concurrent validity of NERPA method compared with results of REBA, as a widely used method, were not verified.
Full-Text [PDF 531 kb]   (109 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Articles | Subject: Ergonomics
Received: 2017/06/1 | Accepted: 2017/10/18 | Published: 2018/03/1

References
1. Moradi M, Poursadeghiyan M, Khammar A, Hami M, Darsnj A, Yarmohammadi H. REBA method for the ergonomic risk assessment of auto mechanics postural stress caused by working conditions in Kermanshah (Iran). Annals of Tropical Medicine and Public Health. 2017; 10(3):589.
2. Koohpaei A, Khandan M, Vosoughi S, Khammar A, Mobinizade V, Farrokhi M, et al. Industrial workers' postures analysis by a new method named "loading on the upper body assessment" in Iran. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Public Health. 2017; 10(4):973-977. Available from: [DOI:10.4103/ATMPH.ATMPH_304_17]
3. Nasl Saraji J, Ghaffari M, Shahtaheri S. Survey of Correlation between Two Evaluation Method of Work Related Musculoskeletal Disorders Risk Factors REBA & RULA. Iran Occupational Health Journal. 2006; 3(2):25-32.
4. Khandan M, Sakhaei Z, Koohpaei AR. Surveying the relationship between musculoskeletal disorders and Occupational stress among Iranian truck drivers. Iran Occupational Health. 2016; 13(2):39-49.
5. Dayani F, Sadeghi Naiini H, Bahrami M, Choopankareh V. Assessment of body work condition by RULA method in a motor vehicle industry in order to design an effective exoskeleton system. Iran Occupational Health. 2012; 8(4):36-47.
6. Nouri J, Azadeh A, Mohammad Fam I. The evaluation of safety behaviors in a gas treatment company in Iran. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2008; 21(3):319-25. Available from: [DOI:10.1016/j.jlp.2007.11.006]
7. Nassiri P, Koohpaei A, Zeraati H, Shalkouhi P. Research note evaluation of exposure to whole-body vibration and its health effects on train operators in tehran-andimeshk line, Iran. Journal of Low Frequency Noise Vibration and Active Control. 2009; 28(4):285-94. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1260/0263-0923.28.4.285 [DOI:10.1260/0263-0923.28.4.285]
8. Poursadeghiyan M, Azrah K, Biglari H, Ebrahimi MH, Yarmohammadi H, Baneshi MM, et al. The effects of the manner of carrying the bags on musculoskeletal symptoms in school students in the city of Ilam, Iran. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Public Health. 2017; 10(3):600-5.
9. Nadri H, Nadri A, Khanjani N, Nadri F, Roodbandi AJ. Evaluating the factors effective on musculoskeletal disorders among the employees of one of Qazvin's governmental offices. Journal of Health and Development. 2013; 2(2):106-16.
10. Khandan M, Ataei Manesh L, Eyni Z, Khosravi Z, Koohpaei A, Poursadeghiyan M. Relationship between Job content and Demographic Variables with Musculoskeletal Disorders among Nurses in a University Hospital, Qom Province, 2014. Jundishapur Journal of Health Sciences. 2016; 11:547-53. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.17795/jjhs-40491 [DOI:10.17795/jjhs-40491]
11. Nazari H, Hossaini Mahjoob H, Tapak L, Mortazavi SS. Prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders and injuries in occupational and physical therapists and its comparison. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal. 2017; 15(1):31-6. Available from: [DOI:10.18869/nrip.irj.15.1.31]
12. Khandan M, Eyni Z, Manesh L, Khosravi Z, Biglari H, Koohpaei A. Relationship between musculoskeletal disorders and job performance among nurses and nursing aides in main educational hospital in Qom province, 2014. Research Journal of Medical Sciences. 2016; 10(4):307-12.
13. Khandan M, Aligol MH, Shamsi M, Poursadeghiyan M, Biglari H, Koohpaei A. Occupational health, safety, and ergonomics challenges and opportunities based on the organizational structure analysis: A case study in the selected manufacturing industries in Qom Province, Iran, 2015. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Public Health. 2017; 10(3):606-11.
14. Nassiri P, Koohpaei AR, Zeraati H, Jafari Shalkouhi P. Train passengers comfort with regard to whole-body vibration. Journal of Low Frequency Noise Vibration and Active Control. 2011; 30(2):125-36. Available from: [DOI:10.1260/0263-0923.30.2.125]
15. Khandan M, Koohpaei A. Assessment and analysis of ergonomics conditions based on TOPSIS in a manufacturing company. Iran Occupational Health. 2016; 13(5):98-108.
16. Khandan M, Nili M, Koohpaei A, Mosaferchi S. Integrating the ergonomics techniques with multi criteria decision making as a new approach for risk management: An assessment of repetitive tasks-entropy case study. Journal of Research in Health Sciences. 2016; 16(2):85-9. PMID: 27497776 [PMID]
17. Khandan M, Koohpaei AR, Nili M, Farjami Y. Occupational musculoskeletal disorders management using Fuzzy TOPSIS Assessment of Repetitive Tasks (ART). Work. 2017; 56(2):267-76. Available from: [DOI:10.3233/WOR-172491]
18. Burdorf A. The role of assessment of biomechanical exposure at the workplace in the prevention of musculoskeletal disorders. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. 2010; 36(1):1-2. PMID: 19967327. [DOI:10.5271/sjweh.2882] [PMID]
19. Silverstein B, Clark R. Interventions to reduce work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Journal of electromyography and kinesiology: official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology. 2004; 14(1):135-52. Available from: [DOI:10.1016/j.jelekin.2003.09.023]
20. Khandan M, Koohpaei A, Kohansal Aghchay M, Ebrahimi M, Khammar A. Assessing the Factors Predicting Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Iranian Port's Personnel Using Regression Model. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal. 2017; 15(4):309-16. [DOI:10.29252/nrip.irj.15.4.309]
21. Li G, Buckle P. Current techniques for assessing physical exposure to work-related musculoskeletal risks, with emphasis on posture-based methods. Ergonomics. 1999; 42(5):674-95. PMID: 10327891 [DOI:10.1080/001401399185388] [PMID]
22. Sanchez-Lite A, Garcia M, Domingo R, Angel Sebastian M. Novel Ergonomic Postural Assessment Method (NERPA) Using Product-Process Computer Aided Engineering for Ergonomic Workplace Design. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(8):e72703. PMID: PMC3745403.
23. Finch E. Physical rehabilitation outcome measures. 2nd edition. Lippincott: Williams & Wilkins; 2002.
24. Allison TR, Symmons DP, Brammah T, Haynes P, Rogers A, Roxby M, et al. Musculoskeletal pain is more generalised among people from ethnic minorities than among white people in Greater Manchester. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2002; 61(2):151-6. PMID: 11796402 [DOI:10.1136/ard.61.2.151] [PMID] [PMCID]
25. DL, Chown P, Kang MS. Cultural diversity in adolescent health care. Medical Journal of Australia. 2005; 183(8):436-8. PMID: 16225454 [PMID]
26. Bulduk EÖ, Bulduk S, Süren T, Ovalı F. Assessing exposure to risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders using Quick Exposure Check (QEC) in taxi drivers. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2014; 44(6):817-20. Available from: [DOI:10.1016/j.ergon.2014.10.002]
27. Abadi AS, Mazlomi A, Saraji GN, Zeraati H, Hadian MR, Jafari AH. Effects of box size, frequency of lifting, and height of lift on maximum acceptable weight of lift and heart rate for male university students in Iran. Electronic Physician. 2015; 7(6):1365-71. PMID: 26516443 [PMID] [PMCID]
28. Khandan M, Roshan zamir S, Maghsoudipour M. [Survey of Workload and Job Satisfaction relationship in a Productive Company (Persian)]. Iran Occupational Health Journal. 2012; 9(1):30-36.
29. Yarmohammadi H, Ziaei M, Poursadeghiyan M, Moradi M, Fathi B, Biglari H, et al. Evaluation of Occupational Risk Assessment of Manual Load Carrying Using KIM Method on auto mechanics in Kermanshah City in 2015. Research Journal of Medical Sciences, 2016; 10(3):116-119. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/rjmsci.2016.116.119
30. Punnett L, Wegman DH. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: the epidemiologic evidence and the debate. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology: Official Journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology. 2004; 14(1):13-23. PMID: 14759746 [DOI:10.1016/j.jelekin.2003.09.015] [PMID]
31. Barkhordari A, Jafari Nodoushan R, Vatani Shoaa J, Halvani GH, Salmani Nodoushan M. [Posture Evaluation Using OWAS, RULA, QEC Method in FERO-ALEAGE Factory Workers of Kerman (Persian)]. Occupational Medicine: Quarterly Journal of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences. 2011; 2(1):14-9.
32. Chiasson MÈ, Imbeau D, Aubry K, Delisle A. Comparing the results of eight methods used to evaluate risk factors associated with musculoskeletal disorders. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2012; 42(5):478-88. Available from: [DOI:10.1016/j.ergon.2012.07.003]
33. Motamedzade M, Ashuri MR, Golmohammadi R, Mahjub H. Comparison of ergonomic risk assessment outputs from rapid entire body assessment and quick exposure check in an engine oil company. Journal of Research in Health Sciences. 2011; 11(1):26-32. PMID: 22911944 [PMID]
34. Jones T, Kumar S. Comparison of ergonomic risk assessment output in four sawmill jobs. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics. 2010; 16(1):105-11. Available from: [DOI:10.1080/10803548.2010.11076834]
35. Drinkaus P, Sesek R, Bloswick D, Bernard T, Walton B, Joseph B, et al. Comparison of ergonomic risk assessment outputs from Rapid Upper Limb Assessment and the Strain Index for tasks in automotive assembly plants. Work. 2003; 21(2):165-72. PMID: 14501094 [PMID]

Send email to the article author


Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb