Karimi F, Soltani M, Shaterzadeh Yazdi M J, Moradi N, Shahriari S, Latifi S M. The Effect of Knowledge of Result Feedback Timing on Speech Motor Learning in Healthy Adults. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal 2019; 17 (2) :171-180
URL:
http://irj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-938-en.html
1- Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
2- Department of Language and French Literature, Faculty of Letters and Humanities, Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz, Iran.
3- Diabetes Research center, Health Research Institute, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Abstract: (4731 Views)
Objectives: The current study mainly aimed at studying the effect of Knowledge of Result (KR) feedback timing and result-estimation opportunity before receiving delayed KR on learning a new speech motor skill in monolingual healthy adults.
Methods: Thirty-nine Persian healthy adults were randomly divided into three groups. Each group received immediate KR, delayed KR (after eight seconds), or delayed KR (after eight seconds) with self-estimation of the result in the delay interval. All three groups received verbal KR feedback. Participants were trained to produce a French phoneme (/ɪn/) in the context of words in four training sessions. The correct production of the target phoneme was judged by a bilingual Persian-French examiner holding an academic degree in French language teaching. Later, a transfer test and two retention tests were administered. The two retention tests were administered one day and two weeks after the last training session respectively.
Results: The effect of feedback timing on motor performance and motor learning was examined by repeated-measures ANOVA. Performance in both acquisition and retention phases was significantly different between groups (P=0.04 for both phases). One-way ANOVA was used to investigate the transfer of learning (P=0.001). Tukey test results indicated that the groups 1 and 2 were different in both acquisition and retention phases and all three groups were different in transfer test.
Discussion: The results showed that the immediate KR is beneficial for the acquisition phase, and delayed KR is more beneficial for the retention and transfer tests compared with immediate KR.
Full-Text [PDF 617 kb]
(6197 Downloads)
| |
Full-Text (HTML) (2203 Views)
Highlights
● Gradually-reducing feedback does not degrade the retention of motor learning.
● Gradually-reducing and high-frequency feedback have almost similar results.
● Immediate feedback may increase the acquisition rate.
● Delayed feedback leads to better performance in retention and transfer tests.
Plain Language Summary
Providing feedback by other persons or devices can affect the learning (e.g., motor learning). The feedback can be during a task, immediately after the task, or after the task (delayed feedback). In this study, we investigate the effect of the time of external feedback on one of the motor aspects of speech, i.e., learning to produce a new sound. We used verbal feedback on the participant’s trials. To investigate the impact of the time of the feedback, the participants categorized into three groups: immediate feedback, 8-second delay feedback, and 8-second delay feedback but as a self-rated interval. We considered three phases for learning: the acquisition (learn to produce the target sound in the single words), the retention (the maintenance of the ability to produce the sound after a certain time), and the transfer phase (the ability to produce target sound in non-trained words). Our results show that immediate feedback leads to better performance at early learning, but the delayed feedback is much better for retention learning and generalization of learning to non-trained motor tasks.
Article type:
Original Research Articles |
Subject:
Speech therapy Received: 2018/10/7 | Accepted: 2019/02/23 | Published: 2019/06/1
Send email to the article author