Volume 16, Issue 4 (December 2018)                   Iranian Rehabilitation Journal 2018, 16(4): 379-386 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ramshini M, Hassanzadeh S, Afrooz G, Hashemi Razini H. The Effect of Family-Centered Nature Therapy on Interactions Between Parent and Child With Autism Spectrum Disorder. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal 2018; 16 (4) :379-386
URL: http://irj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-884-en.html
1- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Literature Humanities and Social Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
3- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (6177 Views)
Objectives: Parents of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) children often have a negative attitude towards themselves. They are often negatively affected by these challenges and the failure of their children. Thus, their interaction with their children is negatively influenced. The present study aimed to investigate the potential effect of family-centered nature therapy on the interaction of parents with their children.
Methods: The present research was a quasi-experimental study with pre-test and post-test design and a control group. Statistical population included all ASD children aged 3-7 years in Tehran city, Iran. A sample of 14 children with ASD were selected through convenience sampling method. The subjects were non-randomly assigned into either the experimental or control groups. The necessary data were collected through Parent-Child Relationship Scale (PCRS) and the program of nature therapy developed on the basis of the current theoretical frameworks and research findings. The collected data were subjected to descriptive statistical analyses and Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA).
Results: The obtained results suggested that the Mean±SD score of experimental group on PCRS after the treatment was 100.14±11.82. While the Mean±SD score of the control group was 84.14±3.93. Moreover, the results of the statistical tests revealed that the difference between the experimental and control groups was statistically significant, indicating that the family-centered nature therapy was effective in improving the parents’ interactions with their ASD children. In addition, the ANCOVA results indicated that the estimated F (13.32) was statistically significant at P=0.001, indicating that the treatment had a positive effect on the dependent variable.
Discussion: Family-centered nature therapy was effective in improving the parents’ relationship with their children. The ASD children had fewer conflicts with their parents, enjoyed a positive relationship with their parents, and showed lower dependence on their parents after receiving the treatment. Therefore, this therapy can be a complementary method along with other standard treatments received by ASD children. It is an effective, simple and readily accessible option to improve the interaction of parents with their ASD children.
Full-Text [PDF 549 kb]   (2447 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (1843 Views)  
Article type: Original Research Articles | Subject: Exceptional Children
Received: 2018/04/26 | Accepted: 2018/08/15 | Published: 2018/10/1

References
1. American Psychological Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders [F Rezaee, A Fakhraei, A Farmand, Persian Trans.]. Tahran: Arjmand; 2013.
2. Sealey LA, Hughes, BW, Sriskanda AN, Guest JR, Gibson AD, Johnson L, et al. Environmental factors in the developmental of autism spectrum disorders. Environmental International. 2016; 88:288-98. [DOI:10.1016/j.envint.2015.12.021] [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.envint.2015.12.021]
3. Russell S, McCloskey CR. Parent perceptions of care received by children with an autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Pediatric Nursing. 2016; 31(1):21-31. [DOI:10.1016/j.pedn.2015.11.002] [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.pedn.2015.11.002]
4. Donnelly LJ. Parent-child interaction in children with autism spectrum disorder who vary in symptom severity and level of functioning. New York: Academic Commons; 2015. [DOI:10.7916/D8028QZ0]
5. Howell Erica LLS, Blacher J. Family impact of children with autism and asperger syndrome: A case for attention and intervention. Austin Journal of Autism & Related Disabilities. 2015; 1(2):2-9.
6. Eskandari B, Pouretemad H, Habibi Asgarabad M, Mazaheri Tehrani MA. [Effect of sensory processing style interventions on increasing parental self-efficacy and child-parent relationship in children with autism (Persian)]. Exceptional Education. 2016; 1(138):14-21.
7. Kayfar MS, Yazdi SAA, Karashki H. [The effect of family-based therapy on the interaction of the mother-child and the prevalence of aggression in preschool children (Persian)]. Research in Clinical Psychology and Consultation. 2013; 4(2):18-4.
8. Mohtashemi T, Ebrahimi F, Aliakbari Dehkordi M, Chimeh N. [Comparison of parental stress, satisfaction, family function of mothers of children with autism with mothers of normal growths (Persian)]. Journal of Exceptional Children. 2016; 4:51-62.
9. Louv R. Last child in the woods: Saving our childran from nature-deficit disorder. New York: Algonquin Books; 2008.
10. Revell S, Duncan E, Cooper M. Helpful aspects of outdoor therapy experiences: An online preliminary investigation. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research. 2014; 14(4):281-7. [DOI:10.1080/14733145.2013.818159] [DOI:10.1080/14733145.2013.818159]
11. Berger R. Beyond words: Nature-therapy in action. Journal of Critical Psychology, Counseling And Psychotherapy. 2006; 6(4):1-6.
12. Sempik J. Green care and mental health: Gardening and farming as health and social care. Mental Health and Social Inclusion. 2010; 14(3):15-22. [DOI:10.5042/mhsi.2010.0440]
13. Mustapa ND, Maliki NZ, Hamzah A. Repositioning children's developmental needs in space planning: A review of connection to nature. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015; 170:330-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.043] [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.043]
14. Apathy M. An exploration of the ways psychotherapists think about the human-nature relationship and the clinical implications of this in Aotearoa-New Zealand [MSc. thesis]. Auckland: Auckland University of Technology; 2014.
15. Kahn PH, Kellert SR. Children and nature: Psychological, sociocultural and evolutionry investigations [AH Vahabzade, A Hosseinian, Persian trans.]. Mashhad: Jahad Daneshgahi Mashhad; 2002. [DOI:10.7551/mitpress/1807.001.0001]
16. Adams M, Jordan M, Wren J, Wright J. The grow project: A report on the Well-being benefits of nature connection for peple with experience of mental distress. Brighton :University of Brighton; 2014.
17. Brown D, Barton JL, Pretty J, Gladwell VF. Assessing the role of the natural environment in a work place physical activity intervention. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. 2014; 40(4):390-9. [DOI:10.5271/sjweh.3421] [PMID] [DOI:10.5271/sjweh.3421]
18. Abareshi Z, Tahmasian K, Mazaheri MA, Panahi L. [The effect of education on child psychosocial promotion through improving mother-child interaction on parental self-efficacy and the relationship between mother and child under the age of three (Persian)]. Journal of Research in Psychological Health. 2009; 3(3):49-57.
19. Pianta RC. Patterns of relationships between children and kindergarden. Journal of School Psychology. 1994; 32(1):15-32. [DOI:10.1016/0022-4405(94)90026-4] [DOI:10.1016/0022-4405(94)90026-4]
20. McDonald NM, Baker JK, Messinger DS. Oxytocin and parent–child interaction in the development of empathy among children at risk for autism. Developmental Psychology. 2016; 52(5):735-45. [DOI:10.1037/dev0000104] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1037/dev0000104]
21. Corazon SS, Stigsdotter UK, Jensen AG, Nilsson K. Development of the nature-based therapy concept for patients with stress-related illness at the Danish healing forest garden Nacadia. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture. 2010; 20:33-51.
22. Shire SY, Goods K, Shih W, Distefano C, Kaiser A, Wright C, et al. Parents' adoption of social communication intervention strategies: Families including children with autism spectrum disorder who are minimally verbal. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 2015; 45(6):1712-24. [DOI:10.1007/s10803-014-2329-x] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1007/s10803-014-2329-x]
23. Rat W. Science-Study and teaching (Early childhood)-Activity program [AH Vahabzade, Persian trans.]. Mashhad: Sahra; 2016.
24. Sellinger VJ, Elder JH. Parent training intervention to manage externalizing behaviors in children with autism. Journal of Pediatric Health Care. 2016; 30(1):73-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.pedhc.2015.10.002] [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.pedhc.2015.10.002]
25. Parr JR, Gray L, Wigham S, McConachie H, Le Couteur A. Measuring the relationship between the parental broader autism phenotype, parent-child interaction, and children's progress following parent mediated intervention. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders. 2015; 20:24-30. [DOI:10.1016/j.rasd.2015.07.006] [DOI:10.1016/j.rasd.2015.07.006]
26. Lu L, Petersen F, Lacroix L, Rousseau C. Stimulating creative play in children with autism through sandplay. The Arts in Psychotherapy. 2010; 37(1):56-64. [DOI:10.1016/j.aip.2009.09.003] [DOI:10.1016/j.aip.2009.09.003]
27. Weiss JA, Lunsky Y. The brief family distress scale: A measure of crisis in caregivers of individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2011; 20(4):521-8. [DOI:10.1007/s10826-010-9419-y] [DOI:10.1007/s10826-010-9419-y]

Send email to the article author


Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb