Volume 15, Issue 4 (November 2017)                   IRJ 2017, 15(4): 341-350 | Back to browse issues page

DOI: 10.29252/nrip.irj.15.4.341

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ebadi S, Naderifarjad Z. Dynamic Assessment of a Schizophrenic Foreign Language Learner . IRJ. 2017; 15 (4) :341-350
URL: http://irj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-559-en.html

1- Department of Foreign Languages, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.
Abstract:   (298 Views)

Objectives: This case study highlights the applicability of Dynamic Assessment (DA) in exploring the cognitive development and intellectual functioning of a schizophrenic foreign language learner.
Methods: The general analytical framework of study to unmask the changes in the learner’s competence is Microgenesis.
Results: Analysis of the findings not only supports the Vygotskian view regarding the significance of meditational tools in uncovering the masked intelligence and cognitive ability but also provides implications for assessing and teaching of schizophrenic students.
Discussion: This case study demonstrated how DA by meditational moves including the presence of mediator, mnemonics, thought-provoking questions, and translation can overcome cognitive and behavioral impairment.

Full-Text [PDF 517 kb]   (100 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (18 Views)  
Type of Study: Original Research Articles |
Received: 2017/07/21 | Accepted: 2017/10/6 | Published: 2017/12/1

1. Haywood HC, Tzuriel D. Applications and challenges in dynamic assessment. Peabody Journal of Education. 2002; 77(2):40–63. doi: 10.1207/s15327930pje7702_5 [DOI]
2. Vygotsky LS. Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1978.
3. Poehner ME. Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting L2 development (Vol. 9). Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media; 2008.
4. Lantolf JP. Second language learning as a mediated process. Language Teaching. 2000; 33(02):79-96. doi: 10.1017/s0261444800015329 [DOI]
5. Feuerstein RY. The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device, theory, instruments, and techniques. Baltimore: University Park Press; 1979.
6. Haywood HC, Lidz CS. Dynamic assessment in practice: Clinical and educational applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.
7. Nuechterlein, KH, Barch, DM, Gold JM, Goldberg TE, Green MF, Heaton RK. Identification of separable cognitive factors in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research. 2004; 72:29-39. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2004.09.007 [DOI]
8. Nuechterlein KH, Barch DM, Gold JM, Goldberg TE, Green MF, Heaton RK. Identification of separable cognitive factors in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research. 2004; 72(1):29–39. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2004.09.007 [DOI]
9. Diamond RJ. What primary care physicians need to know about people with schizophrenia. Wisconsin Medical Journal. 2004; 103(6):29-33.
10. Bersudsky Y, Fine J, Gorjaltsan I, Chen O, Walters J. Schizophrenia and second language acquisition. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry. 2005; 29(4):535–42. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2005.01.004 [DOI]
11. Barrera M. Curriculum-based dynamic assessment for new-or second-language learners with learning disabilities in secondary education settings. Assessment for Effective Intervention. 2003; 29(1):69-84. doi: 10.1177/073724770302900107 [DOI]
12. Kozulin A, Garb E. Dynamic assessment of EFL text comprehension. School Psychology International. 2002; 23(1):112–27. doi: 10.1177/0143034302023001733 [DOI]
13. Schneider E, Ganschow L. Dynamic assessment and instructional strategies for learners who struggle to learn a foreign language. Dyslexia. 2000; 6(1):72-82. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0909(200001/03)6:1<72::aid-dys162>3.0.co;2-b [DOI]
14. Blaufarb H. A demonstration of verbal abstracting ability in chronic schizophrenics under enriched stimulus and instructional conditions. Journal of Consulting Psychology. 1962; 26(5):471–5. doi: 10.1037/h0045408 [DOI]
15. Hamlin RM, Haywood HC, Folsom AT. Effect of enriched input on schizophrenic abstraction. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 1965; 70(5):390–4. doi: 10.1037/h0022507 [DOI]
16. Sergi MJ, Kern RS, Mintz J, Green MF. Learning potential and the prediction of work skill acquisition in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2005; 31(1):67-72. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbi007 [DOI]
17. Kongs SK, Thompson LL, Iverson GL, HeatonRK. Wisconsin card sorting test-64 card version (WCST-64). Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2000.
18. Zhang S, Thompson N. DIALANG: A diagnostic language assessment system (review). The Canadian Modern Language Review/La revue canadienne des langues vivantes. 2004; 61(2):290–3. doi: 10.1353/cml.2005.0011 [DOI]
19. Alderson JC. Diagnosing foreign language proficiency: The interface between learning and assessment. New York: Continuum; 2005
20. Aljaafreh A, Lantolf P. Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal. 1994; 78(4):465-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02064.x [DOI]
21. Birjandi P, Ebadi S. Microgenesis in dynamic assessment of L2 learners’ socio-cognitive development via web 2.0. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012; 32:34–9. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.006 [DOI]
22. Swain M. Examining dialogue: another approach to content specification and to validating inferences drawn from test scores. Language Testing. 2001; 18(3):275–302. doi: 10.1177/026553220101800302 [DOI]
23. Swain M, Lapkin S. Interaction and second language learning: two adolescent french immersion students working together. The Modern language Journal. 1998; 82(3):320–37. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01209.x [DOI]
24. Ewald, J. Language-related episodes in an assessment context: A'small-group quiz'. Canadian Modern Language Review. 2005; 61(4):565-86. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.61.4.565 [DOI]
25. Chaika E. A linguist looks at “schizophrenic” language. Brain and Language. 1974; 1(3):257–76. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(74)90040-6 [DOI]
26. Feuerstein R. Instrumental enrichment. Baltimore: University Park Press; 1980.
27. Hogarty GE, Flesher S. Practice principles of cognitive enhancement therapy for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 1999; 25(4):693–708. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033411 [DOI]
28. Mastropieri MA, Scruggs TE, Mushinski Fulk BJ. Teaching abstract vocabulary with the keyword method. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 1990; 23(2):92–6. doi: 10.1177/002221949002300203 [DOI]
29. Humphries T, Krogh K, McKay R. Theoretical and practical considerations in the psychological and educational assessment of the student with intractable epilepsy: Dynamic assessment as an adjunct to static assessment. Seizure. 2001; 10(3):173–80. doi: 10.1053/seiz.2000.0490 [DOI]

Send email to the article author

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb