Abstract
(2279 Views) |
Full-Text (PDF)
(1020 Downloads)
|
Full-Text (HTML)
(1021 Views)
|
Highlights
● Effectiveness of Bobath versus task-oriented approach in young stroke patients.
● Study objectives: This study compares the effectiveness of the Bobath approach and the task-oriented approach in improving motor activity, activities of daily living, and quality of life (QoL) in young stroke patients.
● Study participants: This study included 60 young stroke patients, with 30 patients assigned to each treatment group (Bobath approach and task-oriented approach).
● Assessment tools: After a three-month follow-up period, three assessment tools were used to evaluate the patient’s progress as follows: The Barthel index (BI) for activities of daily living, the motor assessment scale (MAS) or motor function, and the stroke-specific QoL scale (SSQOL) for QoL.
● Positive results: Both treatment groups demonstrated significant improvements based on the assessment results. This suggests that the Bobath approach and the task-oriented approach can be effective in enhancing motor activity, activities of daily living, and QoL in young stroke patients.
● Comparison with previous research: The study’s discussion section refers to previous research conducted on geriatric stroke patients, which compared the Bobath and motor relearning approaches. The previous studies found both approaches to be effective, but motor relearning showed better results, particularly in female patients.
● Study implications: The current study provides valuable insights into effective treatment approaches for young stroke patients. However, it also highlights the importance of considering gender-specific outcomes in future investigations to tailor treatment strategies more effectively.
Plain Language Summary
This study compares the effectiveness of the Bobath approach versus the task-oriented approach for motor activity, activities of daily living, and QoL in young stroke patients. A total of 60 patients were included in the study (30 subjects in each group). After a three-month follow-up, three assessment tools were used to evaluate the patients as follows: The BI for activities of daily living, the MA scale for motor function, and the SSQOL for QoL. Both treatment groups showed significant improvements based on the assessment results. The discussion highlights that previous research comparing Bobath and motor relearning approaches in geriatric stroke patients found both approaches effective, but motor relearning showed better results, especially in female patients. Overall, this study provides insights into effective treatment approaches for young stroke patients but suggests further investigation into gender-specific outcomes.